Zero Trust Network Access vs. VPN: Which Provides Better Security?

Traditional VPNs (Virtual Private Networks) have long been the go-to solution for secure remote access to corporate networks. However, as cloud technologies and remote work become more prevalent, VPNs often fall short in addressing modern cybersecurity needs. A new solution is gaining traction: Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA).

Comparing Security Principles

VPNs operate on a perimeter-based security model that assumes anyone who successfully connects to the network can be trusted. This approach worked well when networks were largely internal, but in today’s era of remote work, where employees access resources from various locations and devices, this model has significant limitations. Once connected via VPN, users often have access to large parts of the network, which increases the risk of insider threats.

In contrast, ZTNA takes a “Zero Trust” approach, where no user or device is automatically trusted, regardless of their location or identity. Every user, device, and action is continuously verified, and only the minimal necessary access is granted. Trust is not extended to the network as a whole, but rather, application access is segmented and tightly controlled.

Key Differences

1.   Security Model: VPNs follow an "all or nothing" model, often granting users wide-ranging access. ZTNA only provides specific access rights, based on a user’s identity and needs.

2.   Flexibility and Scalability: VPNs become complex and less efficient as remote workers and cloud services increase. ZTNA, by design, supports access from any device or location without compromising network security.

3.   Visibility and Control: VPNs often offer limited visibility into network activity. ZTNA provides detailed monitoring capabilities, allowing for immediate detection of and response to unusual activities.

Which Offers Better Security?

ZTNA represents a significant improvement over VPNs by meeting the modern security requirements of a decentralized, cloud-based working environment. It minimizes the risk of cyberattacks through continuous verification and granular access controls. Unlike VPNs, which may grant unrestricted network access, ZTNA ensures users can only access the applications they need.

---

In conclusion, while VPNs still have their place, ZTNA is a future-proof solution that provides stronger security and better control in today’s increasingly interconnected work environments. For companies looking to meet future cybersecurity challenges, ZTNA is the clear winner.